PDA

View Full Version : My Mother Baked Biscuits for Nazis


Doc Doofus
25th Dec 2007, 05:49 AM
I have posted this little true story a few times on S2C in comments, although in shorter form. I thought maybe it was a good time to bring this back up again. I crossposted this at Dailykos tonight, and it made the top of the Recommended List, first time I've had that honor. You can read the comments there, if you like. (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/12/24/195517/79/915/426219)

This is a debate. It's about how we should treat prisoners and what it says about us.

My Mother Baked Biscuits for Nazis

My mother is 87 years old. She's not as spry as she used to be, but she's still going and can wear out her children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. I'd love to tell you a little tale about her. And as sweet an historical anecdote as this is, there's an important moral and political point to it, at the end.

Born in 1920, my mother ran off to Hollywood with her sister when she turned 18 so they could be movie stars. Well, that never came to be, but they did well in the service industry. My mother eventually married a reserve officer in the US Army who was also a stunt man and stunt coordinator, as well as a schoolteacher.

Then came World War II. He was activated. She spent the rest of World War II being rotated around the states to various Army camps with her husband. Louis was placed in charge of training the First Armored Cavalry for General George S. Patton. As the army demands grew, that division later split and split again into the Second Cavalry, Fourth, Seventeenth, etc. I'm not a military historian, so don't expect perfect accuracy from me, here.

As wife of a base CO, she got to know George Patton. Patton had some rather colorful if not flattering ideas about Jews, which he felt free to share with my mother, over coffee. She never was exactly friends with him, but they went to the same parties, some of which it was her job, by army tradition, to organize. So she knew him and even danced with him.

Louis had a violent streak to him, and he sometimes took it out on my mother. She often had bruises and black eyes. Louis' soldiers offered to beat the crap out of him for her. Why ? Well, this is true, and pardon me if I sound not objective here, she was a VERY beautiful woman in her early twenties -- a beauty by the standards of 1940s Hollywood.

As the war progressed, some of the army camps (we think Fort Knox) received captured enemy soldiers from Europe, at first Italians, then later Nazi German soldiers. According to my mom, the Nazis at Fort Knox were imprisoned behind chicken wire fences that they could easily have jumped over, if they had had anywhere better to go. Fort Knox wasn't too bad, though. They received better treatment there than the black American soldiers who were still required to obey Jim Crow laws with regards to bathrooms and drinking fountains.

Because they were kept not very far from her housing unit, my Mom got to speak to them occasionally. They were very polite and eager to try out their English on her. She remembers them as being a bunch of handsome blond-haired boys. As close to her home as they were, she could see them outside her kitchen window. She used to take them extra biscuits from the kitchen.

Just think about that for a moment. Nazi soldiers in the United States in a prison camp, being fed biscuits by a young Jewish woman who thought it humane to share what she had with them and to speak with them.

Nowadays, we torture prisoners just because it makes us feel good.

Who would blame my mother if she had spit on them, instead of fed them? Americans didn't know everything that was going on in Germany, but they knew enough to know women like my mother were being killed brutally by the thousands. They knew about the concentration camps. They knew about the stars. But my mother never thought of taking it out on them. She fed them f'ing biscuits from the family kitchen.

I asked my mother, why? She said, well, they were so cute, for one thing, with all their blond hair and blue eyes. And so happy and eager to try out their English on her. And she couldn't see why she would hate people that were prisoners. The war was over for them. And they were always so grateful. I can imagine.

This memory is a source of great honor to me and everybody else in my family. This is what distinguished us from the barbarians of the world. Today, as we find out the things that our government does in our name, with our tax dollars, the memory of my mother's compassion and tolerance leaves me feeling hollowed out. They have robbed us all of our honor and decency. And for what? For intelligence?

Think again, for just a moment, how much intelligence they could have gleaned from thousands of Nazi soldiers, many of them officers. Lord knows, some of them must have been involved in much worse atrocities than the people in Gitmo or Abu Ghraib. World War II was a real war, not a fake metaphorical war like the War on Terror. American soldiers were coming home dead from Europe by the thousands. If Americans in 1944 could muster enough decency to treat Nazi prisoners with more humanity than we treat mere suspects today, what have we come to?

I tell this story quite frequently to total strangers, when the subject of Gitmo and Abu Ghraib and water-boarding comes up. Those that have insulated themselves from the collective evil we commit by dwelling on how awful 9/11 need to be reminded, we suffered much worse than 9/11 sixty years ago, and yet we retained our decency then. What changed?

This is not just a source of pride to me. It's a source of pride to our whole country. And the Bush administration and all its defenders need to be held to justice, some day, if we are ever to reclaim our pride.

Synthesis
29th Dec 2007, 01:18 AM
I meant to contribute, not in the debate sense, but in regards to the subject...

Here (http://kiuchi.jpn.org/en/nobindex.htm) you can find the notes of a Japanese airman captured in Manchuria by the Red Army (along with other large reserves of soldiers). He illustrates them simply, and it's amazing how he managed to maintain his positive outlook on the situation throughout the whole affair.

Ultimately, after a long period of harsh manual labor in the Ukraine (the USSR, after all, was devastated by the war to a degree unheard of).

Of course, a consideration is to be made about the brutal, even murderous treatment of POWs by the Japanese themselves (though this was not always the case--during the Great War and Russo-Japanese War, POWs taken by the Japanese were treated extremely well, for political reasons).

I recommend taking a look at the pages...it's very, very informative.

davious
29th Dec 2007, 01:48 AM
What exactly is the debate here?

Lwerszva
29th Dec 2007, 01:56 AM
The debate seems to be over the US's torturing of Iraqi prisoners.

I don't personally like Bush, but it would have been so much better had you left him out of it. Why point the finger at him when the other side is doing the same exact thing? Yes, two wrongs don't make a right, but neither does biased accusation.

Doc Doofus
29th Dec 2007, 03:45 AM
Exactly. Key paragraph:

Think again, for just a moment, how much intelligence they could have gleaned from thousands of Nazi soldiers, many of them officers. Lord knows, some of them must have been involved in much worse atrocities than the people in Gitmo or Abu Ghraib. World War II was a real war, not a fake metaphorical war like the War on Terror. American soldiers were coming home dead from Europe by the thousands. If Americans in 1944 could muster enough decency to treat Nazi prisoners with more humanity than we treat mere suspects today, what have we come to?

Doc Doofus
29th Dec 2007, 03:48 AM
I don't personally like Bush, but it would have been so much better had you left him out of it. Why point the finger at him when the other side is doing the same exact thing? Yes, two wrongs don't make a right, but neither does biased accusation.

Biased accusation? You really don't know after all this time that we are torturing prisoners?

Drakron
29th Dec 2007, 04:50 AM
Sorry but what "Nazis"?

Assuming ALL members of ALL branches of the German military being Nazis is VERY crude, even the SS divisions get iffy at the end of the war.

Heck even being a member of the Nazi party did not make someone a true Nazis, many joined up with the party because it was the only way up it the ranks.

Also the whole point of "doing to then what they do to us" is pretty much "a eye for a eye will make the world blind" since were it ends? in African civil wars child soldiers are use so applying such logic means its perfect alright to use child soldiers since hey! the enemy is using then right?

When we stoop as low as the enemy who wins? if the anwer to Islamic fanatism is the destruction of Islam then its not doing what they accuse us of doing?

And why stop there? the most secure place you can find is a prison so why not cut ALL liberties in the name of security ...

NVRaptor_SC
29th Dec 2007, 05:14 AM
Biased accusation? You really don't know after all this time that we are torturing prisoners?

Yeah, but critics are really stretching what is supposed to be torture pretty far. Prolonged standing in one spot, exposure to loud noise and bright lights, sleep deprivation?
Hell, I've had JOBS that exposed me to all that. Didn't know I was being tortured. Guess I have one heck of complaint to file with the labor relations board.

Doc Doofus
29th Dec 2007, 05:38 AM
Does this qualify as torture?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1540552,00.html
'One of them made cuts in my penis. I was in agony'


Tuesday August 2, 2005
The Guardian

Benyam Mohammed travelled from London to Afghanistan in July 2001, but after September 11 he fled to Pakistan. He was arrested at Karachi airport on April 10 2002, and describes being flown by a US government plane to a prison in Morocco. These are extracts from his diary.

They cut off my clothes with some kind of doctor's scalpel. I was naked. I tried to put on a brave face. But maybe I was going to be raped. Maybe they'd electrocute me. Maybe castrate me.

They took the scalpel to my right chest. It was only a small cut. Maybe an inch. At first I just screamed ... I was just shocked, I wasn't expecting ... Then they cut my left chest. This time I didn't want to scream because I knew it was coming.

One of them took my penis in his hand and began to make cuts. He did it once, and they stood still for maybe a minute, watching my reaction. I was in agony. They must have done this 20 to 30 times, in maybe two hours. There was blood all over. "I told you I was going to teach you who's the man," [one] eventually said.

They cut all over my private parts. One of them said it would be better just to cut it off, as I would only breed terrorists. I asked for a doctor.

Doctor No 1 carried a briefcase. "You're all right, aren't you? But I'm going to say a prayer for you." Doctor No 2 gave me an Alka-Seltzer for the pain. I told him about my penis. "I need to see it. How did this happen?" I told him. He looked like it was just another patient. "Put this cream on it two times a day. Morning and night." He gave me some kind of antibiotic.

I was in Morocco for 18 months. Once they began this, they would do it to me about once a month. One time I asked a guard: "What's the point of this? I've got nothing I can say to them. I've told them everything I possibly could."

"As far as I know, it's just to degrade you. So when you leave here, you'll have these scars and you'll never forget. So you'll always fear doing anything but what the US wants."

Later, when a US airplane picked me up the following January, a female MP took pictures. She was one of the few Americans who ever showed me any sympathy. When she saw the injuries I had she gasped. They treated me and took more photos when I was in Kabul. Someone told me this was "to show Washington it's healing".

But in Morocco, there were even worse things. Too horrible to remember, let alone talk about. About once a week or even once every two weeks I would be taken for interrogation, where they would tell me what to say. They said if you say this story as we read it, you will just go to court as a witness and all this torture will stop. I eventually repeated what was read out to me. [... Read the rest]

davious
29th Dec 2007, 04:20 PM
Considering the Japanese Internment camps, isolated individuals showing kindness in WWWII as an analogy to the current war on terror doesn't seem to fit. Individuals may have been kind, but American policy in WWII wasn't all that different than Gitmo today...Although, back then, you didn't even have to be suspected of anything, Roosevelt and Truman locked you up just because you were Japanese. At least the suspects at Guantanamo have at least been suspected of doing something, and the vast majority of Arab Americans haven't been locked up, they just live in Detroit.

NVRaptor_SC
30th Dec 2007, 12:54 AM
I'm not saying that things that would commonly be considered torture aren't happening. And from reading the article you linked, he never clearly identifies who was doing the torture to him in prison. He just keeps saying "they". Since he was in Morocco, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess it was Moroccan authorities and the U.S. knew what was going on.

Personally I have my doubts about the effectiveness of physical torture. I mean, is the guy telling the truth or is he just saying what you want to hear to make the pain stop?

emmejuice
30th Dec 2007, 01:27 AM
"I mean, is the guy telling the truth or is he just saying what you want to hear to make the pain stop?"

Exactly.

It really sucks for the guy that doesn't know anything... does he just get tortured forever? Of coarse he's going to do anything he can to stop pain.

If somebody was simulating drowning on me I would probably tell them everything I could think of at the time, because I would feel like they were killing me.

And sure, the Nazi's in the prison near your mother were very possibly not die-hard anti-Jew Hitler-fan true Nazi's, but it's not like your mom knew that.

Being Jewish myself I must say I don't know if I could do that. It depends if they were starving. I would feed them then, but I wouldn't give them delicious goodies so they could be happy and content.

Amish Nick_SC
30th Dec 2007, 03:44 AM
This is not just a source of pride to me. It's a source of pride to our whole country. And the Bush administration and all its defenders need to be held to justice, some day, if we are ever to reclaim our pride.
Why not start with the true hippocrates screaming at the top of their lungs about this first. Namely the Democrats who are all outraged about the programs that THEY KNEW FULL ABOUT!

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Pelosi_did_not_object_to_waterboarding_1209.html

Zaggytiddies
30th Dec 2007, 04:00 AM
Hi. Let's stop pointing fingers and really discover what this is about. When are we humans going to figure out that annialating the opposition doesn't work? You teach your children, "share, be nice, don't bite," whatever... why can't adults follow the same creed? People have said to me before, as a form of rebuttal... 'War has gone on since the dawning of time'.... and my response is... 'Doesn't that teach you it doesn't work? Why are we still doing it?.... it doesn't solve anything... Everything else has come along and become mondernized..... war just prolongs the situation until another one starts. It just doesn't' make sense to me that we keep resorting to something that is proven, historically, not to work.... when will we get the point? Doesn't the old adage say, ' If you don't learn from history you are bound to repeat it?' Do we not all sit around and argue... all the time... what life is about/for/means ? Perhaps... just for a moment think... perhaps we are all here to learn to get along? (sorry to get all MLK jr. on you but seriously... the man had a great point) WHAT ARE WE FIGHTING FOR!!!!!!!!! Seriously? Peace? That doesn't make sense.


If we spent the amount of money as we do on war, on food, and clothes, and EDUCATION the world would be a better place. I once worked with a guy who was going to college to be a pastor... He was a beautiful person and I enjoyed working with him so much... His name was Jacob... he said he was studying all these different religions as part of his course... and I said.... ' Does that make you think twice about your chosen religion' and to my surprise he said, ' no.... it makes me stronger in my own beliefs.' I can't understand why... for the life of me... can't we let people believe what they want to believe cause really... when all is said and done... no one knows what happens. I hope with all of myself that you are not just rotting in the ground... and I really believe that all of this crap you go through MEANS SOMETHING... but I don't know... so WHY ARGUE ABOUT SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT?!?!?!??!?

NVRaptor_SC
31st Dec 2007, 02:55 AM
It really sucks for the guy that doesn't know anything... does he just get tortured forever? Of coarse he's going to do anything he can to stop pain.

If somebody was simulating drowning on me I would probably tell them everything I could think of at the time, because I would feel like they were killing me.

Now having sufficiently qualifed my statement, you also have to consider the case of someone like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who is most obviously Al Qaeda and definately knows what's up and what's not. Apparently all it took was about 30 seconds of waterboarding to open him up like a can of sardines. And I'd be willing to bet the information he gave up was the real deal and might have stopped some plots and saved some lives. In the case of someone like that, they could peel the guy like a grape and I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep over it, considering that he and his buddies are hell-bent on killing as many of us as they can.

FurryPanda
31st Dec 2007, 03:08 AM
It's been proven in behavioral experiments that rewards produce better results than punishments. Seems logical to me. Works on kids, clean your room, get ten bucks. Do your job get a hundred thousand bucks. Tell us what we wanna know, get good yummy biscuits. Admittedly in all the scenarios I described there is witholding of reward, which can be akin to torture... 'cept for the kid cleaning his room, but whatever.


Being Jewish myself I must say I don't know if I could do that. It depends if they were starving. I would feed them then, but I wouldn't give them delicious goodies so they could be happy and content.
I'm also jewish, I'd try to make freinds. I volunteer at a low security prison and its amazing what a bit of kindness, a sympathetic ear, and some good old fashioned guilting can do. Seems like it would do the same for the more reasonable breed of enemy. Albeit there ahs to be some problems for them, say a prison cell and crappy food, but take the time to get to know people (as EQUALS) and they'll sing like canaries. Or it would seem that way form my experience.

Lwerszva
31st Dec 2007, 03:23 AM
Hi. Let's stop pointing fingers and really discover what this is about. When are we humans going to figure out that annialating the opposition doesn't work? You teach your children, "share, be nice, don't bite," whatever... why can't adults follow the same creed? People have said to me before, as a form of rebuttal... 'War has gone on since the dawning of time'.... and my response is... 'Doesn't that teach you it doesn't work? Why are we still doing it?.... it doesn't solve anything... Everything else has come along and become mondernized..... war just prolongs the situation until another one starts. It just doesn't' make sense to me that we keep resorting to something that is proven, historically, not to work.... when will we get the point? Doesn't the old adage say, ' If you don't learn from history you are bound to repeat it?' Do we not all sit around and argue... all the time... what life is about/for/means ? Perhaps... just for a moment think... perhaps we are all here to learn to get along? (sorry to get all MLK jr. on you but seriously... the man had a great point) WHAT ARE WE FIGHTING FOR!!!!!!!!! Seriously? Peace? That doesn't make sense.

It's not exactly the US's fault or whoever you're mad at. It's those guys overseas who can't take a chill pill and say, "Okay, I totally don't agree with you, but that's okay." No, they have to go out into crowds and blow people up. They're extremists. If they're too irrational to listen to someone else's point of view and still keep doing these bad things, what else can you do? Leave them alone and let them kill more people? Is that really what you'd want?

As horrible as it sounds, war can solve problems. It's an absolutely horrible thing, and doesn't work all the time, but sometimes it is necessary in order to maintain some stability. Like my friend always says, "Without rain, there'd be no rainbows."

Aquarian2886
31st Dec 2007, 08:36 AM
With all politics mumbo jumbo aside, my thoughts are more moral than anything. I think its an amazing thing to not hate(have to laugh a little bit because you cant have love without hate). I think it is very kind to show forgiveness- or maybe really just pitty, who knows- for your mom to feed the prisoners, especially considering the circumstances. Of course two wrongs dont make a right. Im not saying I would go out of my way to bake for my enemies, but I wouldnt wish bad on them, nor intentionally hurt them physically or emotionally(unless if its self defense).