View Full Version : Is this child a 'hero'?
longears15
27th Mar 2011, 12:29 PM
We've had something of a media furore here the last week or so over Casey Heynes, a 15 year old school kid who fought back against a 12 year old who was bullying him. It hit the headlines because their fight was videoed and posted to YouTube, then taken up by the media - the 12 year old was taunting the 15 year old, grabbing at him, punching him, and the 15 year old responded by picking the younger kid up and body-slamming him into the ground. Video can be seen here (http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xhlepn_casey-heynes-vs-bully_fun). He's since been lauded as a hero for standing up to his bully. Most of the talk-back comments have been about how great this kid is, ditto responses to newspaper articles, etc.
Now - to me, it's an admirable thing to be able to stand up for oneself, but so, so wrong to do it in such a violent manner. The older boy was obviously provoked, and I believe from other reports has been seriously bullied, but battling violence with violence makes him no better than his bully.
What are other people's thoughts?
el_flel
27th Mar 2011, 01:12 PM
I'm conflicted, because on one hand I'm not a lover of violence and because the victim is a fair bit older than the bully there could be a big difference in strength (although if the bully is going to pick on someone older he should be prepared for retaliation, tbh). However, on the other hand I kind of wonder if there was anything else as effective as that the victim could have done to stop the bully.
I don't think I'd call him a hero but I also don't think I can condemn what he did.
whiterider
27th Mar 2011, 01:35 PM
The kid isn't a hero. He might be brave, because victims of bullying tend to become very good at not responding - either the little turd managed to push him over the edge, in which case I wouldn't hold the older kid accountable really, or he decided to respond this time, in which case he's brave. But that reaction, even if brave, wasn't a good one - looking at the kid staggering around afterwards, you can tell how much force was behind that throw. The fact that the bully was being violent really doesn't, as the cliché goes, justify the victim lowering himself to that level; I'm not too interested in whether or not the bully was hurt, but one thing the victim will have learnt from this experience is that where people ignore your attempts at normal communication, violence gets through. This kid doesn't need that kind of twisted thinking adding to his problems.
If I could speak to him, though - I'd say it was a stupid and cruel thing to do, but I understand why he did it, and what's done is done. Might even convince him to apologise, just to highlight how much of a better person he is than the bully.
Robodl95
27th Mar 2011, 01:58 PM
But he was being bullied at that moment, if he had initiated it then it would be different, I see it as an act of defense. I don't know if he's a "hero" because fighting back isn't the best option but if someone is grabbing you, punching you, etc then you should be able to defend yourself!
el_flel
27th Mar 2011, 04:09 PM
Definitely you should be allowed to defend yourself and I'm glad that the kid in the video did just that. But the force he used was clearly way above the force used against him; that's what I'm conflicted about.
Robodl95
27th Mar 2011, 04:22 PM
You have no idea what previous bullying encounters might have been like though.
el_flel
27th Mar 2011, 04:37 PM
No I don't. I'm just judging on the information we have which is the video.
RoseCity
27th Mar 2011, 05:10 PM
He's not a hero. I'm all for fighting back, but it should be done to solve the problem at hand, not get a medal for yourself. Fighting back may get you into trouble, but it's better than running to mom and dad to solve your bully problems.
Zela
27th Mar 2011, 05:12 PM
I wouldn't go as far to say he was a hero, simply because if he was, he would have managed to defend himself and stop the bullying in a non-violent way. However, I kind of know how when you are built up with anger you can just explode. It was good he stood up for himself but the he was older and possibly stronger and what he did to the bully went a bit far as the kid after was stumbling around and looked quite dazed. On the other hand, the guy was defending himself and I'm sure the little kid would come back for more and more if something drastic hadn't been done.
I have really mixed feelings about this, as I see violence as a act of either defence or attack and what happened was a bit of both.
Oaktree
27th Mar 2011, 06:00 PM
I think the term "hero" is often mis-applied. Heroes are people who sacrifice of themselves to help others. This kid isn't helping others in what he did, except maybe incidentally. He is protecting himself, which is something that is generally justified, but he's not a hero.
I don't think he went about it the right way, though. I saw the video and even though I saw the bullying leading up the his response, I still ended up feeling terribly sympathetic toward the bully in the end because the bullied kid overreacted and may have put the bully in the hospital. I felt sick watching the bully hobble around at the end of the video. As much as people think that it's cowardly to go to a teacher or other authority figure in this sort of situation, it is the best way that it could have been handled. The adult would be able to dole out appropriate punishment, which would be a taste of the way our legal system works. In the adult world, if someone hits you, they spend the night (or more, depending) in jail. You are sometimes justified in hitting back in self-defense, but, if you do, you are far more likely to be found in the wrong.
Tempscire
27th Mar 2011, 06:06 PM
The fact that the bully was being violent really doesn't, as the cliché goes, justify the victim lowering himself to that level; I'm not too interested in whether or not the bully was hurt, but one thing the victim will have learnt from this experience is that where people ignore your attempts at normal communication, violence gets through. This kid doesn't need that kind of twisted thinking adding to his problems.
Well, 1)it's kinda true, but 2)this wasn't some situation of the kid trying to communicate to the other boy he ought to do his homework or something else innocuous. He probably did try normal communication-- "stop," "don't," "leave me alone"-- that the bully ignored. When someone repeatedly tries to violate you in some way and shows themselves immune to civilized discourse, then honestly I think violence of some sort is the answer. It should be a last resort, but I don't have very much respect for the capacity of bullies to yield to more civilized resolutions: if they were, they wouldn't be attacking others in the first place.
For one reason or another, some people are screwed up in some way and words aren't going to get through to them in a meaningful way. Maybe some day with therapy and rehabilitation they'll get to that point, but if in the beginning all they respect is a display of force, then it's necessary to speak their "language" to get their attention.
Besides, as this was also a form of self-defense, I doubt Casey's likely to start applying this response to every problem ever, so... slippery slope averted. I'd be more concerned about the lesson he learned that authority figures are willing to pat your on the back after you've been victimized but not actually do anything to protect you in the future. Speaking of,
As much as people think that it's cowardly to go to a teacher or other authority figure in this sort of situation, it is the best way that it could have been handled. The adult would be able to dole out appropriate punishment, which would be a taste of the way our legal system works.
Casey claims (http://www.news.com.au/national/caseys-school-gets-the-all-clear/story-e6frfkvr-1226028830819) to have filed between 60 and 70 incident reports for being bullied, and the school's official policy seems to be to bend over backwards providing support to the victims but no description of how the bullies themselves are handled. It could have been omitted from the story to give it the right 'spin,' I'll admit, but it doesn't seem that unlikely when extrapolating from how many schools in the U.S., at least, opt to handle bullying.
Or what about the lesson that you should never stand up for yourself, that if someone is victimizing you, you don't have a right to fight it off yourself? That if someone starts hitting you, you should only curl up in a ball and take it until someone else (with the proper "authority") stops it or your attacker just gets tired? Everyone is expected to exercise a certain amount of restraint, of course, and no one would be justified for punching a person who accidentally bumped into them, say, but there are generally exemptions in the law for self-defense. Our legal system also works to sort out who did what to whom and when, and to award punishments appropriately. In schools, unlike the real world, fighting off your attacker will see typically you punished equally, without regard for self-defense and who started things.
ETA: apparently, neither boy (http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/03/17/mother-australian-bully-body-slammed-video-demands-apology-victim/) suffered serious injuries, for the record.
malfoya
27th Mar 2011, 11:30 PM
While I do understand how people would respond that way, I don't find it heroic. For me heroism is when people are saving or doing something to help others, not themselves. Standing up to people is a brave thing to do, as most bully victims usually don't do it, in scare.
simneesee
28th Mar 2011, 09:40 PM
I wouldn't call him a hero, because he wasn't saving anyone else.
To be perfectly honest, things like this happen all the time where I'm from and no one bats an eyelash. If you're dumb enough to taunt and pick on someone bigger than you, you should be the fastest runner in the school. And if you are being bullied, people think its worse if you don't fight back. If you are being bullied, you are expected by family and friends to fight back in some way. Most of those ways do not include involving teachers...
crocobaura
28th Mar 2011, 10:07 PM
If you're dumb enough to taunt and pick on someone bigger than you, you should be the fastest runner in the school.
Lol, so true! I'm amazed that no one is scandalised about the bullying, imagine what would have happened if the bully was the bigger, more forceful one. Serves the bully a good lesson. Just because you don't phisically hurt someone doesn't mean your behaviour is OK and should be tolerated indefinitely.
kittielickie
2nd May 2011, 08:30 PM
I was bullied myself all through school. I'm a girl, and guys used to do things like that to me. Even in front of teachers, that wouldn't do anything. I finally got to a breaking point, and did something similar to one of the boys messing with me. Needless to say, he was made fun of the rest of the school year b/c a girl beat him up.
I wouldn't call the kid a hero, but to other kids going through simaliar things, i can see how they would see him as a hero. Growing up is hard. When you go though the proper channels to try to get help, and nothing changes, you have to handle it yourself. I bet that little bastard won't mess with him anymore. he got his point across. Maybe not in the best way, but in the only way he knew how.
Bailey Weggins
3rd May 2011, 09:21 PM
That kid did the right thing in my opinion. The little guy hit him in the face and there's no doubt the bullying had been going on for a while. There's no point in running to the teacher because it makes you look like a whiner, especially when you admit to being bullied by a much shorter person. Being a kid is hard and sooner or later, you have to learn to stand up for yourself.
What worries me is that there are several people just standing around and watching this whole mess without doing anything. Disgusting.
CuddlesdaTeddlyBear
3rd May 2011, 10:51 PM
I can see why people think he's a hero. He stood up for himself! Not many people can do this (myself included) and let their bosses, friends and bullies walk all over them and treat them like something they scraped off the bottom of their shoe. They are forced to suffer in silence, bottle it up inside, spend thousands on professional services and pills or succumb to self-destructive practices because, to lash out and speak their mind would make them 'rank, grunting barbarians'. I'm glad for this kid, that little brat deserved it (he could have got alot worse) and, if more people were afraid of this kind of retaliation from 'poking the hornet's nest', as it were, then the world would be a friendlier place.
Grr, I'm sorry. I just know people in my life that got stepped on and abused like this.
el_flel
3rd May 2011, 11:03 PM
Retaliation and violence can be very self-destructive.
CuddlesdaTeddlyBear
3rd May 2011, 11:24 PM
Retaliation and violence can be very self-destructive.
Was this directed at me? I'm not sure but I just wanted to say that yes, I agree, they can be but, for some people, it's an addiction. I don't like to be violent and I try to avoid confrontation as often as possible, however, not everyone is made the same and I know some people that thrive on confrontation and prefer to be surrounded by enemies instead of friends.
Violence and retaliation (and revenge to an extent) can be self-destructive for the majority, but there are people out there that get hyped up on those vices. The rush of adrenaline, the wanton acts of destruction and the power they have over the weak and vulnerable are like drugs to them.
You can see from that video the smaller kid is enjoying himself as he's smacking around a bigger, more docile target. Sure, maybe his friends goaded him into it but he sure didn't give the impression he was remorseful about what he was doing. (But then again, I'm not a psychic so take what I say with a grain of salt.)
el_flel
4th May 2011, 12:40 AM
Yes, sorry it was. I'm sure it wasn't meant this way, but you mentioned self-destructive behaviour as though violence wasn't self-destructive.
CuddlesdaTeddlyBear
4th May 2011, 01:22 AM
Yes, sorry it was. I'm sure it wasn't meant this way, but you mentioned self-destructive behaviour as though violence wasn't self-destructive.
Ohh, I understand. Sorry, I should have been clear. What I meant was cutting, drinking in excess or even turning to drugs... things like that.
kittielickie
4th May 2011, 01:37 AM
What's even worse, they were FILMING that kid bullying the older one! it's clear that the one filming was a friend of the bully. He was laughing along with the bully until the other kid body slammed him. What's the world coming to?? I'm glad he stood up for himself.
Robodl95
4th May 2011, 03:18 AM
What's even worse, they were FILMING that kid bullying the older one! it's clear that the one filming was a friend of the bully. He was laughing along with the bully until the other kid body slammed him. What's the world coming to?? I'm glad he stood up for himself.
It's not a new phenomenon, besides the recording people have always had a terrible fetish in watching fights, Coliseum?
vhanster
4th May 2011, 11:22 AM
Eh... since when has the action of someone defending himself against bullies been considered heroic?
TashaxSprouse
4th May 2011, 01:32 PM
your not a hero for standing up for yourself :S That doesnt make sense in my opinion. Hes admirable for doing so. But he should have just told someone else like a adult. More mature. Oh well. :)
Robodl95
4th May 2011, 11:19 PM
He did go to an adult, apparently you missed her post.
Casey claims to have filed between 60 and 70 incident reports for being bullied, and the school's official policy seems to be to bend over backwards providing support to the victims but no description of how the bullies themselves are handled. It could have been omitted from the story to give it the right 'spin,' I'll admit, but it doesn't seem that unlikely when extrapolating from how many schools in the U.S., at least, opt to handle bullying.
CuddlesdaTeddlyBear
5th May 2011, 01:07 AM
your not a hero for standing up for yourself :S That doesnt make sense in my opinion. Hes admirable for doing so. But he should have just told someone else like a adult. More mature. Oh well. :)
Actually, a person who stands up for themself can be a classified as a hero. A hero can be defined as:
1. a man distinguished by exceptional courage, nobility, fortitude, etc
2. a man who is idealized for possessing superior qualities in any field
3. classical myth a being of extraordinary strength and courage, often the offspring of a mortal and a god, who is celebrated for his exploits
4. the principal male character in a novel, play, etc
Heroes are not just your typical firemen and First Responders who rescue victims and save lives. They are regular Joes too who stand up against suffering and oppression, whether it be from a crooked government or a difficult supervisor. People can argue whether Casey is a 'hero' or not but he stood up against an abusive force and refused to take it any longer. Everyone stood around and did nothing but watch his suffering. He was the victim and he saved himself.
TheCrossfireX
7th May 2011, 08:46 PM
I've never understood bullies, and having watched some interviews on this, Casey seems to be quite a soft spoken kid. He even admitted violence wasnt the best route. but any child who enjoys publically humiliating someone just because of their weight, needs a good kicking. I don't understand how any normal child can hit, taunt, and continuously berate someone and find it funny. He had what was coming. I'm not even a supporter of violence, I just think that Casey was entitled to defending himself. Perhaps the 12 year old will remember in the future that being a bigger size has bigger advantages.
Undercovers_Agent
8th May 2011, 11:20 PM
I think the term "hero" is often mis-applied. Heroes are people who sacrifice of themselves to help others. This kid isn't helping others in what he did, except maybe incidentally. He is protecting himself, which is something that is generally justified, but he's not a hero.
Criminal starts taunting a cop, cop can't do anything about it. Gets more violent, then the criminal draws a gun, cop shoots criminal. Cop is a hero. Explain to me why the same principal doesn't apply here.
Heroes are not just your typical firemen.
I see so I'm typical now? I feel so depressed : (
Oaktree
8th May 2011, 11:58 PM
Criminal starts taunting a cop, cop can't do anything about it. Gets more violent, then the criminal draws a gun, cop shoots criminal. Cop is a hero. Explain to me why the same principal doesn't apply here.
If the criminal has a gun and pulls it on the cop, it is likely that the criminal is a danger to others. The cop, in choosing that line of work, is putting himself in harm's way to protect people from dangerous criminals. That is why he is a hero.
Undercovers_Agent
9th May 2011, 12:08 AM
If the criminal has a gun and pulls it on the cop, it is likely that the criminal is a danger to others. The cop, in choosing that line of work, is putting himself in harm's way to protect people from dangerous criminals. That is why he is a hero.
The child is being forced under law to go to school, and the bully is a danger to others as well, what if by pickin on the fat guy he staared bullying women? I don't think you'd like that Oaktree.
I will say if that was me, a piledriver into the ground would be the least of his worries. In the fights I had at school, the police and ambulance crews had to be called.
tl;dr
No Oaktree
Don't call my sister a ho
Mistermook
9th May 2011, 12:16 AM
If ambulances had to be called I hope the police were for you...
Undercovers_Agent
9th May 2011, 01:13 AM
If ambulances had to be called I hope the police were for you...
They were for both of us, but common the dude called my sister a ho. You don't do that.
But however thanks to the american legal system, it's not on the ol' record
TurtleLover
9th May 2011, 11:31 PM
I agree I wish some people would learn that violence is not the only way to protect yourself. ;)
Undercovers_Agent
13th May 2011, 12:57 AM
I agree I wish some people would learn that violence is not the only way to protect yourself. ;)
It's not the only way, but it's the most effective way.
Beating the daylights out of someone sends a message, not only to them, but others that says (and pardon my language) "Fuck off"
SuicidiaParasidia
13th May 2011, 02:31 AM
It's not the only way, but it's the most effective way.
Beating the daylights out of someone sends a message, not only to them, but others that says (and pardon my language) "Fuck off"
however, it can also paint a nice big target on your back for a retaliation. especially at school, where you're "ooooh"-ed and laughed at for getting your ass kicked.
in my experience, kids have been jumped on their way to school, had their homes vandalized, etc. for kicking the shit out of someone who in all honesty deserved a slap to the mug.
that "dont start what you cant handle" thing goes further than you think, and if you misjudged how far someone would go to be seen as an intimidating force..... well.... it could be fatal.
Undercovers_Agent
13th May 2011, 02:59 AM
however, it can also paint a nice big target on your back for a retaliation. especially at school, where you're "ooooh"-ed and laughed at for getting your ass kicked.
in my experience, kids have been jumped on their way to school, had their homes vandalized, etc. for kicking the shit out of someone who in all honesty deserved a slap to the mug.
that "dont start what you cant handle" thing goes further than you think, and if you misjudged how far someone would go to be seen as an intimidating force..... well.... it could be fatal.
Well in my personal experiance as a kid/teen beating the living daylights out of one or two people made them leave me and my brothers and sisters alone.
SuicidiaParasidia
13th May 2011, 03:16 AM
Well in my personal experiance as a kid/teen beating the living daylights out of one or two people made them leave me and my brothers and sisters alone.
pretty fortunate, then, i guess. the last incident where someone got retaliated against, where i lived, they were pushed out in front of a car. :/
thankfully, they werent killed from it, but they couldve been. kids got expelled before it could get to that, but everything until then was about one-upmanship. who could be "badder", who could be "tougher".
DigitalSympathies
13th May 2011, 08:53 AM
I have to agree with SuicidiaParadisia here - I was teased to shit when I was a kid for having a slight Korean accent (I'm dual Canadian/American but I lived in Korea for my early years while my parents were on a missionary trip. I know many languages and have an odd blended accent from all over the world) and for just being plain weird like I was. I was jumped one day and had pepper spray shot down my throat by a bunch of kids 2 years older than me, so what do I do? Get a bunch of my frenemies to beat up the two that arranged this thing while I listened to their apologies over a cell phone. The next day I was chased across the schoolgrounds, dragged out to a ditch, kicked and beaten and left for dead. Of course my parents raised hell about it, being a posh private school and all, but bullying is bullying and people can get violent. By the end of the ordeal, when I moved away, not even the teachers liked me because "I fought back too much".
Weezy67
14th May 2011, 02:47 AM
You can always fight back in my book but if its to the point in the post above me i would move too...
DigitalSympathies
14th May 2011, 03:49 AM
^ We didn't move because of the bullying. We moved because my parents got transferred to another city for their jobs at the UN. My mother doesn't work there anymore, but my dad does.
Weezy67
14th May 2011, 05:10 AM
ohhh well still...But being that I am a wrestler I wouldnt let people bully me. I'm not saying I'd get the team to beat them but I'd go 1v1 with the bully
CuddlesdaTeddlyBear
14th May 2011, 12:00 PM
Well in my personal experiance as a kid/teen beating the living daylights out of one or two people made them leave me and my brothers and sisters alone.
My brother's like that. He's laid-back and easy-going until someone starts rocking the boat. He's the kind of person that can get along with anyone but takes s#!t from no one. When he was in primary school he stood his ground against bullies, girls who thought no one could touch them just because they were girls, and teachers who didn't like him because he spoke his mind openly.
I admire people who are able to stand up for themselves and I wish I could be more like him in that regard.
simneesee
15th May 2011, 06:42 AM
I agree with Weezy67. I may not be the strongest or best fighter but I would never have let someone bully me to this extent. At my school if there was a problem, you handled it in the locker room or out back one on one.
A.G.Doren
17th May 2011, 10:23 PM
When I was a kid the answer for a bully was a fist to the face and that was that, you won or you lost, but it was over. I've been done with school for a while. I hear about what is going on, but I don't really know.
If you can't back because of escalation what do kids do? When I was in school you just didn't tell the teachers about bullying at all, we were all kids we were expected to learn to solve our own problems.
Robodl95
17th May 2011, 11:57 PM
Depending on when you were in school a lot has changed since then. Some of my older teachers have told us about how 40-50 years ago physical punishment was still legal, today that would get someone sent to jail. Schools in general are more restrictive and (hopefully) useful for the victim. I don't see too many fights at school but if one does occur it's usually several days suspension and possibly expulsion depending on the severity.
~Dee~
18th May 2011, 01:54 AM
Once a bully targets you the bullying is constant, day in day out you get harassed, picked on, smacked around, called names etc.
There comes a time when you can't take it anymore and you have to decide what to do about it.
You can go to the teachers or your parents, if that doesn't work you have to defend yourself.
Telling a bully to stop it won't help, a bully only understands a physical confrontation unfortunately.
What that kid on the video did looked very dangerous, throwing the bully to the ground like that. I think a punch in the face would have gotten the message across.
I wouldn't call him a hero, just someone who finally had enough.
Undercovers_Agent
20th May 2011, 01:12 AM
I admire people who are able to stand up for themselves and I wish I could be more like him in that regard.
It doesn't take much, I never got bullied much, and when I did it stopped. But when people bullied my siblings, I used to be smug about it. I'd send them get well cards when they were sick, be overly flamboyant when I saw them, and when they were 2-3 years younger then me and knew my reputation, they had to sit there and take it unless they wanted to be kissing the ground.
Rawra
21st May 2011, 07:30 PM
I was bullied once or twice by older boys in my school. I wasn't fat, nor ugly in the perception of other guys, but they just didn't have a life and enjoyed making fun of other people. I told the principal every single time, but she said "yes, yes, I'll do something about it blah blah", yet she never did, so the moment I got rid of them was when they graduated to high school. People like this should kill themselves, they're a waste of space and oxygen.
So, in other words, he's not really a hero, but someone who just can't take it anymore.
vBulletin v3.0.14, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.