No Furry/anthromorphic skintones?

[noobkiller138]

NO, this is not a request. But just a brief question, why aren't there any furry skintones? They came out pretty early for the sims 2 on the exchange, albeit likely stolen from other creators... I digress. Where is the fur? Has no one just gotten around to it or is impossibly hard?

[PhenethyaSim]

I've seen plenty of sims who are Furry or anthromorphic . I know that I saw a set of cat girls somewhere. And I had a cat girl using downloaded tattoos that looked like stipes and cat ear/tail set. So basicly what i'm saying is I think they don't exist because people have made these kind of sims without the skintones.

[noobkiller138]

Could you point me inthe right direction, then?

[PhenethyaSim]

here are the three cat girl http://www.modthesims.info/download.php?t=390255
Rose sims has some stuff too http://www.rosesims2.net/
there are more places you just have to take the time to look around.

[GabyBee]

Just throwing my two cents in about this...

Every time I've ever heard "furry" or whatever thrown around it's always linked to that anthropomorphism sexual fetish. Hell, even on that Deviantart link, if you read the bottom it very openly says "This is "anatomcially correct" meaning "opposite of barbie doll."", and judging by the pixelated bits over parts of the Sims in the picture, it even has full on genitalia for children. I think it's pretty common knowledge that MTS doesn't support most of the "R-rated" type of stuff some people like to make, but that mod goes way beyond R-rated. That's basically child pornography when you think about it.

So in other words... No.

[BL00DIEDHELL]

^^Are you serious? Okay, it's a bit weird that it's anatomically correct, but all anatomically correct skintones are weird to me because there's no real need for it. Yes, the stereotype for furry is essentially animal fucking but not everything to do with the furry fandom is bestiality related. I'm not a furry myself and don't get the appeal of the art and wearing cat ears/tails/fursuits but so long as there's nothing sexual about it (animal fucking), who gives a shit? Live and let live.

That skintone being child pornography is the most retarded thing I've read on this forum, sorry. If it was for sexual gratification, I'd be damn surprised if that uploader shared it, or shit, even enabled genitalia/the entire skintone for all ages. A picture of a naked baby for innocent reasons ('awww look how cute she is in the bath look there's a bubble on her nose!') is not child porn. A picture of a naked baby strictly for masturbation is. If you want to bitch about child porn, maybe go take a look at Reddit's darker side.

OP, if you want a good furry skintone, then the aforementioned 'omg DeviantART child porn T_T' one has a lot of work put into it, but is also pay so I removed the link. Sorry!

[Srikandi]

Moving to WCIF, which is where I think the OP will find more useful replies.

[GabyBee]

^^Are you serious? Okay, it's a bit weird that it's anatomically correct, but all anatomically correct skintones are weird to me because there's no real need for it. Yes, the stereotype for furry is essentially animal fucking but not everything to do with the furry fandom is bestiality related. I'm not a furry myself and don't get the appeal of the art and wearing cat ears/tails/fursuits but so long as there's nothing sexual about it (animal fucking), who gives a shit? Live and let live.

That skintone being child pornography is the most retarded thing I've read on this forum, sorry. If it was for sexual gratification, I'd be damn surprised if that uploader shared it, or shit, even enabled genitalia/the entire skintone for all ages. A picture of a naked baby for innocent reasons ('awww look how cute she is in the bath look there's a bubble on her nose!') is not child porn. A picture of a naked baby strictly for masturbation is. If you want to bitch about child porn, maybe go take a look at Reddit's darker side.

OP, if you want a good furry skintone, then the aforementioned 'omg DeviantART child porn T_T' one has a lot of work put into it, and if you still have the censor mosaic enabled, the genitals shouldn't even be an issue.
http://zachsanomaly.deviantart.com/art/Sims-3-ANTHRO-Tiger-Skin-And-Eyes-338527500
EDIT: Ah fuck, unless you're a skin commissioner, you have to pay for it. What a dick move.

First of all, don't call something you disagree with "retarded". That's a bigoted slur, and you cheapen your entire argument by using that term.

Secondly... Are you seriously going to compare pixelated genitalia on a "furry" mod to fine art that depicts naked children and/or babies? I think Goya and Picasso would slap you in the face for even thinking that. Or even if you're trying to compare it to real baby pictures that parents take to show their own childrens' development. No. You're wrong.

Thirdly... If it's not for sexual fetish shit, I don't care. Live and let live. But if it's not for sexual fetish gratification, why the hell do exposed genitalia need to be included, especially for children. I'm probably in the minority on this issue, at least of the people reading/commenting on this thread, but seriously think about it. The Deviantart link you posted is what I was commenting on, and it was removed because it is payware.

Sexual fetishes are all fine and dandy. I find most creepy and weird, but it's private bedroom business so I really don't care. But I'm going to draw the line here and say that putting your furry child-dick mod on MTS isn't private bedroom business, and if you insist on defending it, I'm going to call you out on it. I don't care how many people disagree with me. It's fucking creepy, and keep it to private messages and whatnot if you really must share it. Otherwise, if you post links to a mod that is proud of displaying the genitalia of children, even in computerized form, I'm going to call you a child-porn advocate. Have fun kicking and screaming and "disagreeing" with my post all you want. People who download that mod should probably be on an internet database of some sort - especially the creator.

[BL00DIEDHELL]

First of all, don't call something you disagree with "retarded". That's a bigoted slur, and you cheapen your entire argument by using that term.

Okay then, "stupid". "Ill informed". Are either of those two preferable?

Secondly... Are you seriously going to compare pixelated genitalia on a "furry" mod to fine art that depicts naked children and/or babies? I think Goya and Picasso would slap you in the face for even thinking that. Or even if you're trying to compare it to real baby pictures that parents take to show their own childrens' development. No. You're wrong.

Did I mention real paintings of naked children? Oooh no, doesn't look like it. No, I mentioned furry CLOTHED art. Perhaps try re-reading my post. According to your own stupid brand of - ahem - "logic", showing off genitals is child porn. So perhaps Goya and Picasso would slap you.

Thirdly... If it's not for sexual fetish shit, I don't care. Live and let live. But if it's not for sexual fetish gratification, why the hell do exposed genitalia need to be included

Take your own advice. Live and let live. Don't like it, don't download.

I don't know why exposed genitalia need to be included at all, quite frankly. It's unnecessary and only something I can imagine a person adding for shits and giggles, unless they were doing a story that included a sex scene (between adults, before you get your knickers in a twist).

especially for children.

Without asking the creator, you and I cannot truly say why it was added for children. For all we know, it could have been done for ease. I'm not a creator, I'll admit so I don't know, but my point is you're jumping to conclusions, when it's already been established that there are innocent reasons for it, and not everything involving naked children is child pornography, art, pictures for child development and so forth.

I'm probably in the minority on this issue, at least of the people reading/commenting on this thread

WELP looks like we're all paedophiles then because we disagree with you. Shut down MTS, it hoards a bunch of sickos lusting after them tiger child dicks.

but seriously think about it.

Take your own advice, perhaps.

But I'm going to draw the line here and say that putting your furry child-dick mod on MTS isn't private bedroom business

Again, without knowing why the creator made that choice, you cannot say for fact that its "private bedroom business". You know a lot of people who legitimately do view child porn try to hide it, right? Posting that skin on the internet for others to download doesn't sound like hiding it. I suppose all the people who are interested in downloading it are paedophiles too? Instead of the fact that maybe they want a tiger skin for a specific Sim?

It's fucking creepy

Honestly, I'm not going to argue with this one. I can absolutely (and non sarcastically) see why a person would be creeped out by that; anatomically correct skintones don't bother me personally because I keep the mosaic on and don't really feel like changing that.

keep it to private messages and whatnot if you really must share it.

No.

If I see a skintone that looks like it might be similar to what an OP wants, I will link it. I will also, however, give a warning "hey, this is anatomically correct so heads up if that makes a difference to you".

if you post links to a mod that is proud of displaying the genitalia of children, even in computerized form, I'm going to call you a child-porn advocate.

Be my guest, I'm just going to return the favour and call you a damn idiot who can't tell the difference between what isn't child porn and what is.

People who download that mod should probably be on an internet database of some sort - especially the creator.

There are internet databases for people who make/distribute/purchase child porn. It's the FBI watch list. If you ever suspect something of even bordering on child pornography, report it. Go ahead, go report that skin if you want, I'd be damn surprised if it gets taken seriously. If somehow it does, I will absolutely apologise.

Also as for the skin being pay, I see that there was a deleted comment because of it being pay material above me - that, unfortunately was done before my initial post, so I'll admit I didn't realise the above skin was already posted and assumed you had seen it on MySims3 blog or somesuch. I will remove the link from my post, so I suggest you do the same, since you quoted me.

[Sunshine021]

http://i1222.photobucket.com/albums/dd488/MizzouSunshine021/Anchorman-well-that-escalated-quickly.jpg

[mangaroo]

BL00DIEDHELL, I deleted the earlier link because the Discussion forum was not the place for the poster to self-promote paid content. (Seriously, so not what MTS is about.) Now that Sri has moved the thread to WCIF, anything goes. But now that this thread is in WCIF, let's all focus on the finding of stuff and leave the debate for the the debate forum.

[GabyBee]

It's the FBI watch list. If you ever suspect something of even bordering on child pornography, report it. Go ahead, go report that skin if you want, I'd be damn surprised if it gets taken seriously. If somehow it does, I will absolutely apologise.


There's many lists besides the FBI watch list. I know Massachusetts has a public database of all registered sex offenders. I'm sure other states do as well.

Anyway... I'm actually going to report this deviantart mod, because it does in fact conflict with Deviantart's own rules and guidelines, which are by any standard VERY loose.

http://i407.photobucket.com/albums/pp159/gabybee/Sims%203/deviantartreport.png

Doneskies.

[BL00DIEDHELL]

BL00DIEDHELL, I deleted the earlier link because the Discussion forum was not the place for the poster to self-promote paid content. (Seriously, so not what MTS is about.) Now that Sri has moved the thread to WCIF, anything goes. But now that this thread is in WCIF, let's all focus on the finding of stuff and leave the debate for the the debate forum.

Yeah, like I said I didn't realise it was the already deleted pay/self promotion so I've edited the link out now. But apologies for that all the same.

Gaby: I was going to say if you replied let's just agree to disagree. You think it's CP, I don't, we can't change the other person's mind so let's just leave it as that. No hard feelings, I hope.

[Sunshine021]

The accusation of being a pedophile is thrown around entirely too much, anymore. Being a furry doesn't make you a pedophile; being an adult attracted to prepubescent children makes you a pedophile. Calm your shit.

[GabyBee]

Being a furry doesn't make you a pedophile. Being a furry who wants a mod with child genitalia might make you one...

But whatever. I've spoken my peace about that Deviantart mod. Agree or disagree, there's not much else to debate at this point. I agree with BL00DIEDHELL in that respect. Get back to the original topic of this, which is for a general furry skin mod, which is totally fine in my book.

[Sunshine021]

Being a furry doesn't make you a pedophile. Being a furry who wants a mod with child genitalia might make you one...

But whatever. I've spoken my peace about that Deviantart mod. Agree or disagree, there's not much else to debate at this point. I agree with BL00DIEDHELL in that respect. Get back to the original topic of this, which is for a general furry skin mod, which is totally fine in my book.

Children have genitalia. Fact of life #851. Children aren't Barbies; we don't magically grow junk once puberty hits, it's with us from birth. Also, it isn't child porn if the child isn't in a sexualized position. It's an anatomically correct skin that the user was demonstrating the look of on all age groups. How do you know if you want that skin if you don't know how it looks on everybody? And you're not fine with it, you've made that perfectly clear. Good luck on getting the DeviantArt mods to listen to you; I've seen far worse over there that has yet to be taken down no matter how much of a stink is raised. I guarantee you, the only reason why it MIGHT get taken down is because you have to pay to get it, not for anything else.

I'm 100% against child pornography, and "fictionalized" child porn can be a huge gray area, but this is not child porn, and never was meant to be. You're doing nothing but contributing to the stereotype of Americans being unnecessarily uptight when it comes to anything to do with the human body. The fact that you threw such a huge fit over an innocent WCIF post says more about you than it does the creator of the skin. I hope that you never visit anyplace outside of America, because I guarantee that you will blow a gasket if you do.

Also, your remark on this website being full of pedophiles? Really fucking uncalled for.

[GabyBee]

1. I'm not American.
2. I didn't say this website is full of pedophiles.
3. You're reading between the lines of my post when there's nothing to read between the lines there.
4. Move on. Get back on topic.

[Sunshine021]

1. I'm not American.
2. I didn't say this website is full of pedophiles.
3. You're reading between the lines of my post when there's nothing to read between the lines there.
4. Move on. Get back on topic.

I'm probably in the minority on this issue, at least of the people reading/commenting on this thread, but seriously think about it.

Otherwise, if you post links to a mod that is proud of displaying the genitalia of children, even in computerized form, I'm going to call you a child-porn advocate.

Really? And don't you live in Boston? :S

[GabyBee]

Living in Boston doesn't mean I was born here, and I said minority on the issue of the people reading/commenting on this thread. If you want to turn this into a semantics argument... I'm done. Just get over it and move on. I've said my opinion, and you've said yours. Neither of us are going to change our stance, and at this point you seem like you're just picking apart the semantics of a post on an internet forum just so you can be "right". Get over it.

[Sunshine021]

Well, you can't argue against your own words. But yeah, I'm done. I just don't particularly care for people accusing my friends of being pedophiles, but whatever.

[Grobnic]

All I have to say is WOW
...all this ranting and raving over a skin request,and the worst of it is the ranting and raving isnt even about the request its self

[murfee]

:blink:
YIKES!! :faceslap: :lol:

Anyways....

The best advice I could give to anyone at the moment is to fully patch their game, so they can make use of the free CAS body hair section that was included in I think the GEN patch. The werewolves included in SN really only have just hairier versions of the body hair already released in the patch, so it's not much of a stretch/loss.

There are a few CC modifications to the Gen Patch hairs, as well as lots of mods that allow you to tweak the body hair section of CAS.